The Public Works and Economic Development
Act of 1965 authorized creation of a number of regional commissions
throughout the United States, to provide planning and assistance to
socially and economically stagnant areas. The four Corners area was
subsequently designated as one of these. The natural beauty of the region
is well known, and attracts throngs of visitors each year. But population
is sparse (less than two million people live within the 92 county region
of the Four Corners states) and economic bases are, as a rule, narrow.
The rough terrain limits the number and quality of trade arteries. The
land itself yields crops and minerals only spottily. Labor markets are
seasonal and relatively few in number.
Doing something to alleviate these problems
is the job of the Four Corners Regional Commission, comprised of the
governors of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico, their staffs, and
a federal contingent.
Heading the Four Corners Commission is Orren
Beaty, appointed to the position of Federal Co-chairman late in 1967.
Beaty is a native of New Mexico who in his early years traveled the
state with his father, a Department of Agriculture employee. In New
Mexico, Beaty edited a small newspaper, went on to a degree in journalism,
and subsequently moved to Arizona, where he covered the doings of the
Arizona legislature for one of the large metropolitan newspapers.
Beaty has been in Wasington for the past
twelve years, first on the staff of Representative Stewart Udall, then
as Administrative Assistant when Mr. Udall became Secretary of The Interior.
In August of 1967, Beaty resigned that position to accept the federal
co-chairmanship of the Four Corners Commission.
His duties in that post entail considerable
travel, and we were fortunate enough to stop his forward motion long
enough during a recent trip to interview him at our offices in Flagstaff.

Western Gateways: We
want to ask you first about the official name of your organization.
Originally it seems to have been referred to as the Four Corners Economic
Development Commission; lately we read about the Four Corners Regional
Commission. Has the name changed?
Orren Beaty: No,
it hasn't really changed, but there are a lot of different ways of labeling
it and none has been used enough for people to be familiar with it.
The 92 county area is officially known as the Four Corners Economic
Development region. We generally see items in the papers referring to
the Four Corners Regional Commission, which refers to the people that
have the responsibility. The Commission is made up of the governors
of the four states that are involved, plus a federal Co-chairman. That's
my job. Sometimes discussions refer to us as a "regional action
planning commission". That's really just a play on words resulting
from early written discussions on the concept, where it was pointed
out that there has to be planning but at the same time they expect action
out of The Commission, not just a lot of study.
Western Gateways: What
form of participation is taken by the governors of the involved states;
are they backed by staffs?
Orren Beaty: In
the four states there are at least three different patterns. Each governor
has an alternate. Beyond that, let me tell you how different these patterns
are. In Arizona the alternate member is Stanley Wolmer, the governor's
staff director, who works in the governors' office all the time, but
not on this commission work all the time. He started getting experience
in this area back when Howard Pyle was governor and the Arizona Development
board was created.
In New Mexico the State Planning Director
is on the governor's staff, with many duties. He's in charge of the
poverty program, the state publications, and a professional planning
staff. They have some very good people, with a lot of experience, economists,
planners, and so on.
In Colorado they have a state planning department
and a conservation commission completely separate from the governor's
office Dwight Neil, our man in Colorado, is not on the governor's staff
like Arthur Ortiz is in New Mexico, but he probably has more experience
along this line than anyone else working with The commission.
In Utah we have a different pattern. There
is a young professional planner on the governor's staff, but he is not
the governor's alternate, rather, he works for the governor on a day-to-day
basis. The alternate, D. Howell Moffat, is an attorney, has been a leader
in Utah tourist and industrial development, and that sort of thing.
He serves in a non-paid position as Chairman of the Industrial Promotion
Commission in the state of Utah.
Western Gateways: Then
these are much more than honorary positions for the governors.
Orren Beaty: They
are. In fact when The Commission is to meet, the governors only agree
to a date when each is certain he can attend. And they have attended.
The alternates, too, when we've had meetings with them, make a point
of being there and being prepared.
Western Gateways: Are
the purpose and functions of your Commission similar to the so-called
Appalachia program that was developed for a depressed area in West Virginia?
Orren Beaty: Our
enabling legislation was passed about a year after the Appalachia Commission
was set up. There are five such regional commissions, called Title Five
Commissions. I'm not sure of the order in which hey were created, but
the first two were the Upper Great Lakes Commission and the Ozarks Commission.
The Upper Great Lakes area is in trouble because the good timber has
been cut off and the high grade iron ore depleted. And of course the
Ozarks area has never been very prosperous, as everyone knows.
The whole of New England also comprises
one of the regions, the only one that includes complete states. Of course
this simplifies the research and statistics because you don't have to
derive figures for parts of states. Another of the regions is the Gulf
Coastal Plains, the area from the fall line of the rivers in North and
South Carolina and Georgia.
Western Gateways: What
factors go into qualifying a region for this sort of designation?
Orren Beaty: It's
a matter of employment rates, worker migration. Many times the population
of an area won't show a decline, yet the births are just taking place
of the deaths and the people moving away. It's a stagnant situation.
Other considerations are drastic changes in industrial patterns, shutting
down of big plants, the abandonment of government installations. For
instance in planning their participation, New Mexico was leaving out
Chavez County, which includes Roswell. Roswell is one of the bigger
towns in the state and has always been a trade center for southeastern
New Mexico. During the planning of regional commission boundaries the
Air Force shut down Walker Air Force Base, which has become one of the
major factors in the area, so Chavez county was added to the region.
Now all of Eddy County, just south of Chavez, wants to be included,
and although the governor doesn't want to start a boundary-changing
situation right away, New Mexico is inclined to bring in Eddy County.
The potash deposit down there has been quite productive, but it's playing
out now; one company has shut down completely. These are just illustrations
of how and why areas are included.
Western Gateways: There
will probably be revisions, then, as time goes on, and those are at
the volition of the states?
Orren Beaty: That's
right. These have to be approved by the joint federal-state group; no
one does anything without the approval of the others. But I don't think
the federal government is going to throw up roadblocks if one state
wants to do something and the other states in the region aren't opposed
to it.
There are some other things that qualify
an area for inclusion. One has to do with education; there are many
cases of sub-standard education for Indians and it's partially because
of language problems. Another is condition of housing, for instance
how many houses are so many years old, whether they have the right kind
of facilities, how far is it to the outdoor toilet, and so on.
Western Gateways: Would
Indian participation in the Commission be through the Governor's offices?
Orren Beaty: No,
it would be separate. There is the Indian Development district of Arizona
- - the IDDA -- which includes a number of Indian reservations. The
Navajos are the only tribe in the state that hasn't joined. The Arizona
governor's office has a directional role in getting this going, but
eventually IDDA will be independent, not directly responsible to the
governor's office. It will be responsible to the Economic Development
Administration (EDA) in Washington. The back-up organization in EDA
that takes care of IDDA also provides our commission with administrative
and technical back-up, so we are very closely inter-related. But IDDA
couldn't participate directly in the Four Corners Commission without
going through EDA in Washington. And our functions are different. IDDA's
program is mostly studies followed by attempts to lure other government
agencies or industry into doing things with them. Our commission, on
the other hand, will eventually make expenditures and have a more direct
connection with other government agencies that have programs in this
area. For example when we find something we think is helpful on an Indian
reservation we can work with the Bureau of indian Affairs, and when
we get funds, supplement what they have available.
Western Gateways: Do
you have any figures available comparing Indian unemployment with that
of the region as a whole?
Orren Beaty: Yes.
Nationally, 39% of the population participates in gainful employment.
That is from the 1960 census. At the same time this figure was only
33% in the Four Corners region. The Four Corners state with the best
rate was Colorado, with 34.4%. Only 6 countries in the 92 country region
had median incomes larger than the national median. the median income
in the region was $5,060 annually compared with $55,625 nationally.
More than 25% of the families had a median income below he $3,000 a
year poverty level, compared with 21.4% nationally.
Western Gateways: Governor
John Love of Colorado was the first state Co-chairman, wasn't he? When
does the Co-chairmanship change?
Orren Beaty: We
have done this on a fiscal year basis. Each of the state co-Chairmen
will serve through June. Every other quarter of the fiscal year the
state co-Chairman presides and the alternative quarter the federal co-chairman
presides. But by presiding neither loses his voting rights or his rights
to make motions or anything else. It is a full participation type of
chairmanship.
Western Gateways:
How was the first state co-Chairman chosen and how will his successor
be chosen?
Orren Beaty: Well,
the governors themselves do it. I have no vote in that. At the opening
meeting somebody nominated Governor Love and they all agreed he was
the logical choice, I think partly because he doesn't have to run for
election this year. Then they nominated Governor Rampton of Utah for
alternate co-chairman. He declined and somebody nominated Governor Williams.
He declined and then he nominated Governor Cargo of New Mexico and he
said he would be happy to serve.
Western Gateways: It's
taken some time to choose the headquarters location. Would you tell
us what was involved in doing that?
Orren Beaty: You
know it took so long to make a choice that someone wrote Governor Rampton
and suggested we put the headquarters in a Greyhound Bus, so we could
spend a week in Farmington, a week in Cortez or Durango, a week in Moab.
What we did was to set several criteria
over a period of time. One was that the headquarters city would have
to be in the development region, not just anywhere in the four states.
That eliminated Denver, Salt Lake City, and Phoenix. Albuquerque and
Santa Fe are within the region and both were interested in it, but another
criteria was that it should be in the Four Corners area so it wouldn't
drop down a well in a larger town where there are other federal agencies
and that would be the last you'd hear of it. Location near the heart
of the region would have a better psychological effect. That cut it
down to the towns nearby that showed interest. Cotez and Durango in
Colorado, Farmington, New Mexico, Page and Flagstaff, Arizona. Three
towns in southeastern Utah tried. Blanding, which is pretty small and
isolated, Monticello, which is a little larger but also doesn't have
commercial air service, and Moab, which has air service. To get a decision
there has to be a majority vote of the governors. When they vote two-to-two
then they let me cast the deciding vote.
Western Gateways: Who
wrote it that way?
Orren Beaty: Congress
did. I guess they didn't want anyone cramming anything down the states'
throats. And in effect if the federal Co-chairman can consult with two
of the governors he may persuade the other two to go along on an issue.
Each governor of course feels obligated to support his own state, and
they did at first. They weren't quite sure the law read like it did,
so we got an opinion from the General Counsel's Office of the Department
of commerce. It stated very clearly that the majority of the governors
had to vote, and that I had to actively vote, I couldn't just pass.
Cortez made a real good case for itself
and conducted, I thought, a good hard-headed campaign to get the site,
offering us free office space. Durango met all the standards we laid
down as to size, transportation, and college to provide some back-up
for the commission. Page was just a little bit out of it. In the end
it really got down between Moab and Farmington. I thought that Farmington
was a better choice and that is where it wound up. It is a little larger,
has excellent air service, and a small college, a branch of another
college. There is an agricultural experiment station set up to take
care of planning and preparation on the Navajo Irrigation Project.
Western Gateways: Having
been on Secretary
Stewart Udall's staff, you're familiar with the Golden Circle (Grand
Circle) concept. How is your organization related to this?
Orren Beaty:
The Golden Circle (Grand Circle) is still more of a concept than a concrete
thing. What is the Golden Circle (Grand Circle), after all? It's not
a perfect circle, but things that are in here and there. I am sure there
will be interest and controversy over how many paved roads you put into
an area and how much of it you leave inaccessible and unspoiled.
Western Gateways: Do
you expect the Four Corners Commission to be involved in the promotion
of Golden Circle (Grand
Circle) routes, or is the machinery geared up on them to he point
where you will just be aware of what is happening and watch it develop?
Orren Beaty:
I regard this as part of our responsibility. If the governors and I
working together determine that lack of roads has held back development
then this is an area that we ought to attack. The state highway commissioners
and engineers of the four states put together a plan and I hope to have
a map on it before long. This will propose all kinds of new roads. There
are two or three in southern Utah going through the Ute
Mountain country. There are two roads from Farmington south through
Chaco Canyon and Crownpoint.
Western Gateways: Would
you tell us how your office in Washington is set up?
Orren Beaty: We
are authorized a staff, and I have nine people including myself. Ultimately
we will try to get by with about seventeen, which will include about
three stenographers. These are federal people, a separate staff, but
the Commission staff will not be federal people. The whole thing will
work under a staff director.
We are looking for people in each of the
states who are well known and have had more than just casual experience.
The staff director will be operating in our headquarters in Farmington,
but will probably average a week out of each month in Washington, and
I will be out in the regional office in the same way.
Western Gateways: Then
you'll have what? . .about fifteen people in Farmington?
Orren Beaty:
I think so. The authorization is for twenty-five, but no one expects
it to get to that. At this point we don't have the work for them to
do, and of course we don't have the funds. nobody will be assigned specifically
to say New Mexico, or to Arizona, but there will of course have to be
a certain amount of specialization. There will be two working on each
state, plus a staff director, and three or four girls -- a total of
twelve or thirteen, then. I think we can borrow people from the state
universities if we need them. The Dean of the School of Agriculture
at New Mexico State has already said he would make someone available
to us.
Western Gateways: Well,
we thank you for taking the time for this interview. The work you are
doing for the Four Corners area and for the Grand Circle is important
and necessary. We wish you success.
Biographical
Information on Orren
Beaty, Jr.
Born June 13, 1919 in Clayton,
New Mexico
He served in the U.S. Army and Air Force and in the Department of the
Interior under the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations.
He was the Administrative Assistant to Representative Stewart L. Udall
(Arizona) in the United States Congress. He retained his role as administrative
assistant when Udall was appointed Secretary of the Interior (1961),
and continued working in that position until Udall left office (1967).
He served as the federal co-chairman of the Four Corners
Regional Commission and continued his involvement with state,
local, and national politics, working as an editor for Congressional
Digest (1969-1970).
Orren Beaty received
the Golden Spike Award for his "work on balanced transportation.